InvestorDictionary.com
HomeDictionaryCategoriesBooks
Search for Terms:  
Browse by Category:  
Browse:  A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z  # 
  Search:       

The Economic Structure of Corporate Law

by Frank Easterbrook, Daniel R. Fischel

List Price:$31.00
Amazon Price:$27.90 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25.
You Save:$3.10 (10%)
Average Rating:4 out of 5 stars
Lowest New Price:$27.90
Availablitiy:Usually ships in 24 hours

Buy Now!


Editorial Reviews
Product Description

The authors argue that the rules and practices of corporate law mimic contractual provisions that parties would reach if they bargained about every contingency at zero cost and flawlessly enforced their agreements. But bargaining and enforcement are costly, and corporate law provides the rules and an enforcement mechanism that govern relations among those who commit their capital to such ventures. The authors work out the reasons for supposing that this is the exclusive function of corporate law and the implications of this perspective.




All Customer Reviews
Average Customer Review:4 out of 5 stars
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful:

5 out of 5 starsCLASSICAL BOOK, 2006-07-12
Es un libro de obligada lectura en materia de Derecho de sociedades de capital. Se puede decir que se ha convertido en pocos años en un "clásico" del Corporate Law.


2 of 33 people found the following review helpful:

1 out of 5 starsBig Waste!, 2001-05-10
Don't buy this book unless you like fiction. And bad fiction at that. This book contains absolutely no analysis (like all of this author's writings).


13 of 13 people found the following review helpful:

5 out of 5 starsA classic of the field, 2001-01-11
Easterbrook and Fischel collected a series of law review articles into the classic text on the contractarian theory of corporate law. During the 1980s, E&F were two of the corporate law academy's enfants terribles. Their articles were provocative, yet insightful. They raised a lot of hackles, yet did ground-breaking work. Both E&F have gone on to bigger and better things. Easterbrook is now a judge on the US 7th Circuit. Fischel is dean of the UChicago law school. "The Economic Structure ..." stands as their legacy for corporate law.

Like other contractarians, E&F model the firm not as an entity, but as an aggregate of various inputs acting together to produce goods or services. Employees provide labor. Creditors provide debt capital. Shareholders initially provide equity capital and subsequently bear the risk of losses and monitor the performance of management. Management monitors the performance of employees and coordinates the activities of all the firm's inputs. The firm is simply a legal fiction representing the complex set of contractual relationships between these inputs. In other words, the firm is not a thing, but rather a nexus or web of explicit and implicit contracts establishing rights and obligations among the various inputs making up the firm.

The nexus of contracts model has important implications for a range of corporate law topics, the most obvious of which is the debate over the proper role of mandatory legal rules. As a positive matter, contractarians contend that corporate law in fact is generally comprised of default rules, from which the parties to the set of contracts making up the corporation are free to depart, rather than mandatory rules. As a normative matter, contractarians argue that this is just as it should be. E&F devote the bulk of this text to tweaking out these implications across an array of important topics, such as limited liability and insider trading.

Their analysis is not flawless. As but a single example, E&F consistently opt for the so-called majoritarian default. Their basic thesis is that by providing the rule to which the parties would agree if they could bargain, society facilitates private ordering. Majoritarian defaults are not always desirable, however, even if a potentially dominant one can be identified. Sometimes penalty defaults are preferable. Penalty defaults are designed to impose a penalty on at least one of the parties if they fail to bargain out of the default rule, thereby giving at least the party subject to the penalty an incentive to negotiate a contractual alternative to the penalty default. They force the parties to choose affirmatively the contract provision they prefer. Penalty defaults are appropriate where it is costly for courts to determine what the parties would have wanted. In such cases, it may be more efficient for the parties to negotiate a term ex ante than for courts to determine ex post what the parties would have wanted.

Having said that, however, this remains one of the most significant monographs on corporate law. I highly recommend it for an corporate lawyer's bookshelf.


13 of 15 people found the following review helpful:

5 out of 5 starsCoase Applies; Coase is Right ..., 1999-01-30
The classic exposition of law and economics in the corporate field. This book consolidates and expands upon several law review articles written in the early 1980s that have reshaped how corporate and securities law and policy have developed. If you want heavier economic analysis, this book is lacking, but if you want *structure* and *framework* then this book is ideal.




Price is accurate as of the date/time indicated. Prices and product availability are subject to change. Any price displayed on the Amazon website at the time of purchase will govern the sale of this product.
Store Categories
Accounting
Bonds
Commodities
Economics
Finance & Investing
Financial Store
Futures
Insurance
Mutual Funds
Options
Real Estate
Retirement Planning
Stock Market
Taxes
Technical Analysis
Trading

Related Products



Browse:  A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z  # 
The Financial Ad Trader
Copyright © 2009 InvestorDictionary.com - All rights reserved.