2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
not the greatest resource, 2008-01-02
I was given this book as a new hire in the media department of an ad agency. Gee, thanks. Way to thoroughly confuse a newbie! The book is very redundant and does not really explain how to relate the principals to real life practice.
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful:
Media Planning: A Pratical Guide, 2006-08-17
This book is filled with useful information about Media Planning. Every student of the Advertising Industry should have this book to use as a guide when starting out in the Advertising career path.
10 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
Ouch!, 2004-02-09
Jim Surmanek may know a great deal about media planning. However, most of the people who attempt to read this book will never discover that. Why? Jim does not know how to communicate effectively. I have not made it too far into this book, and every inch has been a struggle. What I have learned thus far could have been expressed in one, maybe two, paragraphs.Jim's opening sentence (in his Introduction to the book) reads, "Advertising media are dynamic and ever changing." Traditionally the opening sentence in any book is very important: The first sentence is the sentence that is to hook the reader, engage us, entice us, make a proposal that the writer will later explain and document. The first sentence must be superbly well constructed. It must do something meaningful. Jim took this valuable space and chose to say one thing twice, and repeat himself while being redundant. Good heavens, wasn't that fun? An opening sentence that says "media does not stay the same" is not very engaging or informative. Perhaps Jim assumes that most of his readers don't know that. Perhaps Jim thinks most of readers are watching a black and white nine-inch screen, have never heard of cable, and have to wait for the tubes in their radios to warm up before they can listen to the weekly episode of Mystery Theatre.
His next sentence reads, "The entire spectrum of media outlets changes almost daily." (Jim explains "change": new radio or television stations, changed formats, new magazines, etc.) Now, how can that be true? That the entire spectrum would change almost daily. That the spectrum changes daily, yes. But the entire spectrum of media outlets changes almost daily? Does he really mean to tell his readers that nearly every radio and television station, nearly every magazine and newspaper, and nearly every billboard changes owners or formats nearly every day? No, but that is what he says.
I skipped the first two chapters to take a look at Chapter 3, "HUT, PUT, and PUR." Appropriately enough, Jim explains what HUT, PUT, and PUR are. Several times. That is, several times before he repeats himself. He also shares some fascinating data with us: "People Using Radio (PUR) levels also vary." (That is important for the readers to know because most of the readers have no idea that people turn their radios on and off.)
Jim continues, "Adult listening peaks in the 6-10 P.M. period..." Now that didn't make sense to me. I thought adults listened to their radios more during "drive time" and while at work than when they got home in the evenings. So I looked at the table attached to this text (3.3) only to discover that of the five time periods Arbitron reports (and Jim uses in the table), the two busiest adult time periods are the 6 AM to 10 AM and the 10 AM to 3 PM periods. In fact, the time period Jim claims as the "adult peak," has less than half as many listeners as these morning/daytime periods. The only time with a smaller audience than Jim's "adult peak" is the Midnight to 6 AM time period!
As I continue along, still in Chapter 3, I see a Table (3.4) with a whole bunch of numbers. Jim never references this table or explains what it reveals. The numbers don't seem to relate to anything else in the chapter. I also notice that Table 3.4 is followed by a second Table 3.2 that does not give the same data as the first Table 3.2.
If you want to be thoroughly confused, love misinformation, enjoy reading the same "fact" presented three or four times, and want to be talked to like a child, buy this book. Savor it; it is a gem.
If I could return this book I would. I can't. Fortunately I live in a cold climate. I have a fireplace. I will put this book to good use.
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
Not Worth It, 2001-02-26
Contrary to what the previous reviewers have to say about this book, I was extremely unsatisfied. The author makes what is so simple into something that is confusing and frustrating. Earlier chapters talk about topics that aren't even explained until later in the book. It takes a paragraph of confusing examples to explain what could be easily said in a sentence. Equations are given without proper explanation of how things were achieved. This book shows the 5th step with the assumption that the reader figures out steps 1-4. To someone new to the media planning field, I would recommend you pass this one by.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
Solid Introductory Resource, 2001-01-12
Book that provides a basic background to all aspects of media planning with chapters ranging from 'HUT, PUT, and PUR' to 'Psychographics/Clustering', to 'Negotiating a Media Buy'. Definitions and basic terms are well set apart from the rest of the text and explained clearly and one chapter builds upon the ones before in a way that makes it easy to read without feeling overwhelmed. Written in 1995, the book is hampered a bit by being entirely lacking in any reference to Internet advertising.