4 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
Contradictory and useless , 2005-01-21
Wallerstein introduces his theory that all states are--and always have been--a part of the capitalist world-economy regardless of their internal political characteristics, arguing that communist states were always a part of this system--yet they somehow 'lost' to the capitalist states and ultimately 'collapsed'. Huh? If they collapsed, what did they collapse from? This is just one of many inherent contradictions in Utopistics that left me wondering why it was even written (and published). There is nothing fresh or inciteful. He tells us that the global economy is heartless and racist, that greed is bad, and that we are at some crossroad in history that we will only understand 50 years from now (after the fact). Then he attampts to come up with some neo-socialist 'ideas' that have been described elsewhere in much more detail.
Just a provocative title, a rehash of old ideas with cute new terms like 'TimeSpace' and 'asymtotes', and little else. Waste of money.
11 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
Read this book, 2003-02-08
... Wallersein states that his task is to explore alternative possible historic systems, not to develop a new utopian vision. He states explicitly that his task is not to work out the details but to look at the decline of the current world-system and consider alternatives systems that could arise out of the chaos that the decline will cause. In this, Wallerstein succeeds not in defining or predicting the future, but exploring how things will change organically and what those who would like to see transformative change can work toward--not that there is any guarantee that what arises will actually be better than what now exists.In predicting the future, however, the reviewer above overlooked a lot. When you consider that Utopistics was written in 1998 and since then we have seen the attack on the WTC, the Cole attack, and the embassy attacks. The number one world threat is a non-state terrorist organization--which Wallerstein suggested would develop in Utopistics.
This book is, in its own way, a new manifesto for activists. This book outlines a new vision that is transformative, yet organic; one that could arise out of chaos and the decline of the dominant paradigms in which the oppressed continue to participate in their own oppression.
19 of 38 people found the following review helpful:
No-vision illustrated by Nutty ideas, 2001-06-15
Wallerstein was fine writing historical analysis. But when he turns to proposals for the future, he fails miserably.
He starts out by saying that he wants to provide a vision of the future that's not Market-is-everything and not communism, but something more realistic, which he calls "Utopostics". OK, that sound nice. So what is it?
He has no idea. He just says "we should try to make things more democratic and more equal and nice, and then probably we'll get to somewhere better, although I don't know what it is." Oh.
And he proposes some efforts of equality, which is plain stupid. He says that for hiring people for any position, the existing various exams and qualification tests are there to maintain the status quo and prolong discrimination, so we should abandon it. And we should replace it with... get this, draws. "When you want to hire 30 people out of a 100, it's not right to evaluate and rank qualifications, because the guys with the 30th score and 31st score doesn't have significant differences, so it's not rational to hire one and forego the other," he says. "So let's take 3 from the top, discard the bottom 3, and ther rest should draw straws. This would make the world more equal." ... He's joking, right? Wrong. He's dead serious. He thinks this is better. Well, maybe it's more equal, but would it make a better selection? Do I want to trust people who just drew straws? Not really.
His other proposals are equaly nuts and totally unrealistic. And in the end, he tries to justify his inability to provide the vision for the future by citing chaos theory, saying that it's actually impossible to predict anything. Ah, if you are going to weasle your way out like that, don't even try to write this sort of book. And for all you potential readers out there, save your time and money. You'll learn nothing here.